Pros multi-media zines: reviews ahoy!
Dec. 7th, 2011 12:44 amHello, DIALJ Christmas tree watchers!
So we have had music as we open the presents, and there have been calendars and icons and ficlets and stories and I have none of these. I can't do graphics, and I made someone go ewww with my most recent drabbly effort (*iz proud*) so perhaps I won't do that, and I stupidly posted a story a fortnight ago which would have done quite nicely today and now I haven't got one for today. Whoops. But
byslantedlight did say anything Pros-y. So I thought I would tell you all about my zine adventures.
I like zines, and I have bought quite a lot of them. Most of them are zines which are still in print, and some of them are very recent indeed. And nearly all of them are Pros-specific. So Pros-specific that even a crossover with Ladder of Swords is quite the departure. It is comparatively easy to find reviews of recent zines, and it is comparatively easy to find reviews of Pros-specific zines.
But recently I took the plunge and bought second-hand a great heap of crossover and what I gather are called multi-media zines. I kept waiting for them to sing at me, or to smell of interesting things if I scratched them, but apparently that is not the same kind of multi-media. Alas. Anyway, it is not nearly so easy to find reviews of these zines. Not if you only know about Pros resources on the web. (I did find a few which listed all the B7 pairings in them, and I expect that there are reviews over in S&H-land, but that is foreign territory to me.) So I thought I'd do some.
So here we go. I split them into separate posts, a zine per post. And over the course of the day, as LJ permits, I shall post a bunch of them. I am hoping to post them for Concupiscence, Concupiscence 3, Dark Fantasies 2, Dark Fantasies 4 and It's Greek To Me. We'll see how it goes. If you get fed up, do feel free to beg me to stop!
So we have had music as we open the presents, and there have been calendars and icons and ficlets and stories and I have none of these. I can't do graphics, and I made someone go ewww with my most recent drabbly effort (*iz proud*) so perhaps I won't do that, and I stupidly posted a story a fortnight ago which would have done quite nicely today and now I haven't got one for today. Whoops. But
I like zines, and I have bought quite a lot of them. Most of them are zines which are still in print, and some of them are very recent indeed. And nearly all of them are Pros-specific. So Pros-specific that even a crossover with Ladder of Swords is quite the departure. It is comparatively easy to find reviews of recent zines, and it is comparatively easy to find reviews of Pros-specific zines.
But recently I took the plunge and bought second-hand a great heap of crossover and what I gather are called multi-media zines. I kept waiting for them to sing at me, or to smell of interesting things if I scratched them, but apparently that is not the same kind of multi-media. Alas. Anyway, it is not nearly so easy to find reviews of these zines. Not if you only know about Pros resources on the web. (I did find a few which listed all the B7 pairings in them, and I expect that there are reviews over in S&H-land, but that is foreign territory to me.) So I thought I'd do some.
So here we go. I split them into separate posts, a zine per post. And over the course of the day, as LJ permits, I shall post a bunch of them. I am hoping to post them for Concupiscence, Concupiscence 3, Dark Fantasies 2, Dark Fantasies 4 and It's Greek To Me. We'll see how it goes. If you get fed up, do feel free to beg me to stop!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 09:54 pm (UTC)I am basically totally gen on S&H, so I won't care what you say... unless you've decided to review some gen stories? If you did I'll be curious what you said. But if you write about slash I won't care even if you trash it because I just can't enjoy it for S&H anyway.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 06:12 am (UTC)*drops the shooter with one up the spout* Oops.... >.>;;;;;;
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 08:44 am (UTC)They're not all unrestrained enthusiasm, and I am totally at sea with some fandoms, and I hope one or two authors won't be too pissed off, but I have tried to be fair.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 08:07 am (UTC)The 'trouble' with Palely Loitering is that it's still LJ and I suppose we're considering worst case scenario here.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 08:19 am (UTC)No, they copied various pages from Palelyloitering.com - as far as I know they've generally credited my site as the source.
But Palelyloitering.com (www.palelyloitering.com) is a completely independent website, paid for and hosted by a friend of mine - it's not anything to do with livejournal at all. Livejournal could vanish tomorrow, and Palelyloitering.com would still be there!
Are you confusing the website with
no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 08:45 am (UTC)Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-07 11:51 am (UTC)Fanlore has its place - and a fine place it is *g* - but I really want to encourage Pros fen to use and support Pros dedicated sites first. Not exclusively, but first.
I think it's vitally important that a fandom have its own resources. While multi-fandom resources are wonderful - I love them, I use them, I support them! - nothing beats the experience of fannish immersion and fandom-specific resources are an integral part of that experience.
On a more practical note, as
And I really want to echo your call to make sure that fan works have more than one home! I'm so tired of seeing fannish history lost - needlessly - when a little extra effort could avoid it. And trying to resurrect and reclaim fannish history and fan works is a far, far more time and labor intensive process!!
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 08:14 am (UTC)I agree about fandom-specific resources - provided they aren't all in the same place! Maybe mirror-image coms on Dreamwidth?
Fanlore is run by fans for fans, so it's up to us what goes up there. If you haven't seen full reviews that will be because nobody has felt like putting them up there...
I feel strongly that we need to store stuff in lots of different places. if resources are worth having they are worth keeping in ways that ensure they won't be lost.
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 08:22 am (UTC)Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 08:49 am (UTC)Seriously, you can (and probably should) contribute to Fanlore. It's like Wikipedia - only as good as its contributors on any particular issue. I'm not only an ardent supporter of AO3/Fanlore/OTW, I've actually volunteered to help from January.
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 09:06 am (UTC)Similarly, and
My final problem though, and the one that compounds all my other thoughts about Fanlore/AO3/OTW is that I just don't have time! I can contribute to Pros, to our fandom, which is why I'm here at all, but I actually need to spend some time off the computer, too! I have contributed to Fanlore/AO3/OTW indirectly by gathering together information about Pros fandom history at
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 09:32 am (UTC)I can understand your feelings about the fandom multiverse but don't share them. *g* I need the big party, and the big library, and am quite happy to wander around looking for the people or shelves that might interest me. That, of course, means I would never have/spare the time to do the kind of work you do for Pros. So I'm glad you feel the way you do!
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews & Fanlore
Date: 2011-12-08 11:08 am (UTC)I love knowing context and history for all sorts of things, so it is interesting to know how Pros fits in (and sometimes it helps explain bits and pieces), but there is so much on fanlore, and occasionally you stumble across bits which are clearly contested.
But I am happy in Pros. Occasional trips abroad, yes (and at least I know some names to look out for if I fancy a visit elsewhere now), but after all those stories, I am going to curl up with some Pros-specific fic now!
Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews
Date: 2011-12-07 11:33 am (UTC)REPLACE hXXp with http for the links.
Delighted to see more zine reviews. Look forward to reading them, especially as I'm familiar with the zines and always curious to see what others think.
Yes, you absolutely should think about where to place the reviews so that they remain available, and moth2fic is right that folks should make sure that fan works have more than one home. Luckily, you have several excellent options!
I would strongly recommend that you send the reviews to BOTH the Hatstand Archive (the original, not the automated Hatstand Archive) and to the Palely Loitering website. Both are dedicated Pros sites and already have well established zine review sections and both are always eager to have more. Also, both welcome diverse opinions on zines and stories, and love having multiple reviews of zines.
There is absolutely NO problem with housing the zine reviews at both sites. Pen (Hatstand Archive) and
If you go to the main page of the Hatstand Archive (hXXp://hatstand.slashcity.net/) about halfway down the page you'll see a link to the Professionals Slash Fanzines: "a master listing of zines with Pros slash content. Links go to pages for each zine or series of zines, giving contents, availability, comments or reviews where available, and contact info for publishers or agents of in-print zines."
On the Professional Slash Fanzines page (hXXp://hatstand.slashcity.net/zineinfo/fanzines.html), Pen says: "I'd love to add more reviews! Or synopses of stories, for that matter. Please consider sending me any you have and I'll add them to help prospective buyers decide whether a zine might be to their taste or not."
You can reach her at: hatstander at gmail dot com
The Palely Loitering website will host reviews at the site itself (which I'd recommend to have the info available off LJ as well as on) or link to other sites/LJ pages if you prefer.
hXXp://www.palelyloitering.com/index.html
You can email
IMO, the Hatstand Archive (and the Automated Hatstand Archive) and the Palely Loitering website are among the crown jewels of Pros fandom and the archivists/maintainers are true treasures! Let's take advantage of the existing Pros infrastructure to keep fanworks accessible.
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews
Date: 2011-12-07 11:45 am (UTC)Thanks! Now that I have started posting them, I am already seeing typos and mistakes (and to think that I complain about typos in others' work) so they're not going anywhere yet. I've already talked to
I'm familiar with the zines - this is the bit I am half-dreading and half-praying for: the fact that there are going to be a lot of people here who know not just this fandom but all the others much better than I do. I hope I don't tread on too many toes. But I am very interested in hearing other people's opinions.
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews
Date: 2011-12-07 12:07 pm (UTC)As to treading on toes, I'm firmly in the camp that an honest opinion is a million times preferrable to a polite fiction. I have NO problem with critical reviews or less than enthusiastic responses. Those are as important - if not more important - than uniformly positive reviews. Just tell me what you think (positive and negative) and why you formed that opinion, and I'm going to appreciate the effort - even if I don't agree with you.
So long as a review or opinion piece is not motivated by malice, with the deliberate intent to cause distress and/or harm, then I don't think there should be a problem with an honest, critical or even negative review. And those that are solely prompted by malice are NOT honest reviews anyway!
When it comes to an outside perspective on a fandom, those can be quite interesting. There's even a periodic fest/challenge in vidding circles specifically built around that, where folks watch vids in unfamiliar fandoms and then review and try and explain them.
Re: Zines With Pros Content - Where to Place Reviews
Date: 2011-12-08 09:12 am (UTC)And thank you for your very kind words about palelyloitering.com - it's not all it could be yet, but I shall keep working on it! *g*
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 06:06 pm (UTC)(Of course, you'll get me wanting to dive into my zines just as I'm going away from them for three week. Huh)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-07 11:26 pm (UTC)You won't have time to read zines on your travels, there will be writing to do instead!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 08:37 am (UTC)Palelyloitering.com (www.palelyloitering.com) was originally planned to include reviews of everything to do with Pros zines, and I define Pros zines as anything with a Pros story in it! So ideally there'll be reviews there of all the stories in the multifandom zines, including the non-Pros stories (cos if there's one good Pros story in a zine and the other stories are awful then I for one would probably try to get hold of the Pros story separately. But if the other fandom stories were supposed to be excellent, then I'd probably buy the zine itself, thinking that one day I might read them. So multi-fandom reviews like that would be useful for me, anyway (and to be honest, useful-for-me was one of the reasons I started Palelyloitering! *g* Trouble is, I've been concentrating on Pros to get the website up and running, so there aren't any multifandom reviews up yet - until now... *g*
Are you happy for me to copy your reviews over, rather than just linking to them? It'll make for safer archiving, as
no subject
Date: 2011-12-08 11:31 am (UTC)But I'm also rethinking (again...) the whole thing about what needs preserving where. The web throws up occasional firestorms where some sort of tiny interest suddenly gets catapulted into global prominence for a day, and everyone suddenly has an opinion on... oh, a Youtube moment or a Twitter remark. People still remember, say 'cat in the wheeliebin woman' or - no, actually, I don't want to name too many because they're trying to live it down!
I am generally much happier on mailing lists where there is some sort of assumption that everyone has made at least the effort of subscribing and so things have some sort of limited circulation (and yes, I know that stuff gets forwarded off such lists, but...) rather than on the web where Google throws stuff up to anyone. But I gather I arrived about five years too late for that. Things are on the web - and I ought to be grateful, because without that availability I would never have found it after all that time.
But I'm looking at what I put in some of those reviews and thinking "ow. I would not like to defend that to.." (insert appropriate friends, family, employer here). On the other hand, I would have liked to have known more about them before buying them.
For some reason, I am less bothered about this when it comes to my stories. I don't know why.
Oh, it's all so complicated!